Difference between revisions of "User:SimaLazenby88"
|Line 1:||Line 1:|
My name is
My name is in .I in .<br><br><br>id="cnetReview" section="rvwBody" data-component="indepthReview"> to the --the ,the it's a , of the , and .<br><br>a couple of ,the 6 (I this ).<br><br>View full gallery Sarah Tew/CNET a . The has and , and it the - , the 'a of of a . , for ,the .
Revision as of 02:06, 16 August 2019
Hello from United States. I'm glad to came across you. My first name is Ariel.
I live in a city called Atlanta in western United States.
I was also born in Atlanta 37 years ago. Married in March year 2003. I'm working at the post office.
id="cnetReview" section="rvwBody" data-component="indepthReview"> As the long-awaited sucessor to the six-year-old D700 , the Nikon D750 delivers admirably. While its $2,300 price tag (£1,800/approximately AU$2,600) inhabits the upper reaches for many enthusiasts, it's a perfect camera for people who are picky about their photographs, who need better high-sensitivity quality than you can get with one of the less-expensive full-frame options or an APS-C-based dSLR, and who need speed for action shooting. Plus, it's a solid option for pros looking for a good value.
The camera comes in a couple of official kit configurations. The $3,000 bundle with the 24-120mm f3.5-5.6 lens is the only Nikon-approved kit in the US, but a 24-85mm f3.5-5.6 kit will also be available in the UK and possibly Australia (I couldn't find any available options with prices at the time this review was published, however).
View full gallery The D750 will be sold with the 24-120mm lens in the US, plus additional kits with the 24-85mm f3.5-5.6 lens in the UK and possibly Australia. Sarah Tew/CNET Image quality
Nikon really does a nice job on photo quality. The D750 has an excellent noise profile for both stills and video, and it produces significantly cleaner raw images than the Sony A99 does as ISO sensitivity increases -- unsurprising, since the latter is two years old and its image processing doesn't benefit from a couple years of fine tuning. I like the more neutral white balance of the Sony's default profile, though; Nikon's is just a hair shifted toward red/blue. And while the D810 maintains sharpness and tonal range better across the sensitivity range, for about $1,000 less the D750's photo quality stands up pretty well against the D810's.